Thanks Sirken

[Lazie]

Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When will this non-factor shut the fuck up alrdy?

I don't know when will you stop typing ?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

When will this non-factor shut the fuck up alrdy?

^^^ LOL Irony.

[Archalen]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes thank you Sirken. Objectively, I think this punishment is acceptable and it will quiet the whiners.

Totally not worth the two weeks of RNF though Chest. Maybe next time you idiots can keep it in the petition section where it belongs and let Sirken do his job.

Yes, we all believe you are very objective.

[Hitpoint]

^ Turned an open and shut case into a complete shitshow.

[Uteunayr]

I find myself in complete agreement with my guildies above.

[sanforce]

Yes, thanks for shutting this shit-show down Sirken.

2 weeks is the acceptable punishment for a first time trainer.

TMO is ok with tossing IB a Draco lifeline when they are on the cusp of falling apart.

[Skittlez]

7th

[Sirken]

yw <3

[Derubael]

Can you guys go shit up another thread? There's plenty of other places to argue in RnF.

Thanks for being understanding. We would have preferred to wrap up that train the day we found out about it and treating is as a non-raid dispute, but BDA wanted to pursue the issue as a raid dispute and we wanted to respect that. We really, really (seriously, desperately) want you guys to start working out all disputes on your own. It takes a huge burden off our shoulders and allows us to spend more time on the majority of the player-base and their problems. The ~340 petition threads in the petition forum shows just how much attention is required by the CSR staff on a day-to-day basis.

As we continue to work out the growing pains of this system, we hope guilds will be able to cooperate and negotiate more efficiently and effectively. What we really want is for everyone to work together to have fun, regardless of class. This will make our lives easier and let everyone enjoy the game more, while allowing everyone to feel as though they are part of a community that they themselves rule over.

We know it's going to take a little while to get adjusted, but once that happens we hope the entire server can run more smoothly, with less drama and tension, and more fun.

[zanderklocke]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can you guys go shit up another thread? There's plenty of other places to argue in RnF.

Thanks for being understanding. We would have preferred to wrap up that train the day we found out about it and treating is as a non-raid dispute, but BDA wanted to pursue the issue as a raid dispute and we wanted to respect that. We really, really (seriously, desperately) want you guys to start working out all disputes on your own. It takes a huge burden off our shoulders and allows us to spend more time on the majority of the player-base and their problems. The ~340 petition threads in the petition forum shows just how much attention is required by the CSR staff on a day-to-day basis.

As we continue to work out the growing pains of this system, we hope guilds will be able to cooperate and negotiate more efficiently and effectively. What we really want is for everyone to work together to have fun, regardless of class. This will make our lives easier and let everyone enjoy the game more, while allowing everyone to feel as though they are part of a community that they themselves rule over.

We know it's going to take a little while to get adjusted, but once that happens we hope the entire server can run more smoothly, with less drama and tension, and more fun.

Is there a general definition somewhere or can one be created so it becomes apparent what is a raid dispute and what is a player dispute?