The Fraud of Evolution Exposed

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by mgellan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Humans didn't evolve from apes, we both evolved from a common ancestor. So comparing a human with a chimp is meaningless. But, of course, Creationists aren't interested in actually understanding something if they can dismiss it with a "clever" picture.

Aren't you a little old to have an invisible friend tho?

Regards,
Mg

Lol dude, you're so delusional it is ridiculous. Please, tell me, which common ancestor did we evolve from? Nobody fucking knows. Why? Because it never fucking happened and you have to have down syndrome to think it did. First of all, why the fuck would one species diverge into two completely separate species, one of which is completely superior in every way imaginable to the other. That alone makes absolutely no sense.

I love how you speak of evolving from a common ancestor as fact like retard atheists tend to do A LOT when in reality, it's never been proven and nobody knows who or what this supposed common ancestor even is. Hence why the fuck it's called the missing link retard. But please go on and tell me how evolution is a proven fact lol. Wanna know what are proven facts? The law of biogenesis and Cell Theory. Never once has an experiment or study been conducted which has in anyway disproved either of these scientific facts and guess what, both of them disprove the possibility of evolution. There are no missing links with these scientific facts.

[theaetatus]

Wow, the stupid really is strong in this one. I don't have enough time to explain just how much you misunderstand science. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Joseppi]

People are people

Monkeys are monkeys

Two different things

[Illuzionz]

I don't misunderstand science at all. You just have completely full blown down syndrome and think you understand it. Nobody has ever seen evolution occur and it cannot be reproduced in a lab. Not to mention it violates multiple established scientific facts such as the law of biogenesis, cell theory, the laws of thermodynamics and more!

[Joseppi]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't misunderstand science at all. You just have completely full blown down syndrome and think you understand it. Nobody has ever seen evolution occur and it cannot be reproduced in a lab. Not to mention it violates multiple established scientific facts such as the law of biogenesis, cell theory, the laws of thermodynamics and more!

[radditsu]

genetics.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not to mention it violates multiple established scientific facts such as the law of biogenesis, cell theory, the laws of thermodynamics and more!

How? LOL

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How? LOL

LOLLL!!!! Well let me tell you LOL!! HAHA LOL!!

First of all, the law of entropy means that everything is in a constant state of decay. It's impossible for molecules to become increasingly complex over time because the law of entropy states that all things do the exact opposite. For instance, the sun is giving off heat and will eventually burn out and die. It is in a constant state of entropy and will continue until it dies, never regaining any of the energy it lost. Matter inherently decays and breaks down over time. It does not randomly form itself into more and more complex things over time which is exactly what evolutionists argue despite the fact that this is literally impossible.

Then we have cell theory and the law of biogenesis both of which state that all cells must come from previously existing cells and that all life forms can only produce or come from their own kind. I/e Bacteria will ALWAYS produce more bacteria and can ONLY produce more bacteria. The same has been tested and proven so much to the point that it is an established scientific law. So if cells can only come from pre-existing cells and at one point there were no cells then it is impossible that cells can form naturally which is the exact opposite of what evolutionists claim.

Scientific theories are designed to be an extension of scientific laws and all theories are based off of laws as they are designed to explain the characteristics of these laws. For instance, cell theory and germ theory are an appendage of the law of biogenesis. Relativity is an appendage of Newton's laws of motion. Please tell me which law the theory of evolution is an appendage of? There is none because it contradicts several of them. You cannot have a theory that contradicts a scientific law which is exactly what evolution does but they say "well don't worry we'll find the missing link eventually, it's just a matter of time!". So literally all of evolution hinges on the hope and assumption that eventually the missing link will be found.

In other words, evolution is pseudo-science by definition.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't misunderstand science at all. You just have completely full blown down syndrome and think you understand it. Nobody has ever seen evolution occur and it cannot be reproduced in a lab. Not to mention it violates multiple established scientific facts such as the law of biogenesis, cell theory, the laws of thermodynamics and more!

So by your logic, since nobody has ever seen Earth's tectonic plates move more than a few feet, so clearly it doesn't happen. Very slow processes by their very nature would not be observed in the last few hundred/thousand years of human observation.

Regardless, there are literally thousands of cases of observed adaptation in both plants and animals. I mean, do you eat or are you aware of this thing called corn? Ever seen a cat or a dog?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOLLL!!!! Well let me tell you LOL!! HAHA LOL!!

First of all, the law of entropy means that everything is in a constant state of decay. It's impossible for molecules to become increasingly complex over time because the law of entropy states that all things do the exact opposite. For instance, the sun is giving off heat and will eventually burn out and die. It is in a constant state of entropy and will continue until it dies, never regaining any of the energy it lost. Matter inherently decays and breaks down over time. It does not randomly form itself into more and more complex things over time which is exactly what evolutionists argue despite the fact that this is literally impossible.

Then we have cell theory and the law of biogenesis both of which state that all cells must come from previously existing cells and that all life forms can only produce or come from their own kind. I/e Bacteria will ALWAYS produce more bacteria and can ONLY produce more bacteria. The same has been tested and proven so much to the point that it is an established scientific law. So if cells can only come from pre-existing cells and at one point there were no cells then it is impossible that cells can form naturally which is the exact opposite of what evolutionists claim.

Scientific theories are designed to be an extension of scientific laws and all theories are based off of laws as they are designed to explain the characteristics of these laws. For instance, cell theory and germ theory are an appendage of the law of biogenesis. Relativity is an appendage of Newton's laws of motion. Please tell me which law the theory of evolution is an appendage of? There is none because it contradicts several of them. You cannot have a theory that contradicts a scientific law which is exactly what evolution does but they say "well don't worry we'll find the missing link eventually, it's just a matter of time!". So literally all of evolution hinges on the hope and assumption that eventually the missing link will be found.

In other words, evolution is pseudo-science by definition.

Your understand of science is pseudo. The problem with people like you is you dabble a little in science and try to twist words to mean what you want them to.

You are also a bit confused as to what constitutes a law or a theory.
Theories can be completely independent of a law. They also act in different ways.