Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit?
yes 327 68.99%
no 147 31.01%
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2013, 11:55 AM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You'll have to do some research for the exact news post that implemented it, I'm sure that contains information. Or perhaps your fellow players will help. I'm not here to answer your question about why every policy exists, just to fix your misconceptions.

You're still comparing it to eqlive in the rest of your post. It's not an EQLive related policy. You should stop doing that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I honestly didn't read many responses to Rogean, so I never seen your reply. However, from what I remember, VP is the way it is due to the fact that IB and TMO were always petitioning raids and that VP had/has horrible pathing. I was there before it opened and was there when it was opened and the months following.

I am pretty sure both of those reasons were stated, one reason VP was supposedly delayed and then forced to roll for mobs was because of all the shit slinging months prior (supposedly).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty much this is what I remember. I think Rogean even made a post. Now that there is FTE, and a lot has changed on the server I don't see why the zone should be a FFA. Haven't been able to read all 72 pages yet, so if I am wrong, then I am wrong.
It was said, It is known.

P.S. The PnP policy means absolutely nothing to how things were actually handled, so you factually proved nothing. A policy and how a Policy is enforced are two completely different things, I would think that you guys could, at the very least, grasp that.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #2  
Old 08-13-2013, 04:32 PM
timhutton timhutton is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was said, It is known.

P.S. The PnP policy means absolutely nothing to how things were actually handled, so you factually proved nothing. A policy and how a Policy is enforced are two completely different things, I would think that you guys could, at the very least, grasp that.
I'm sorry, I'm just not going to take your (or anyone else who could potentially be biased) memory or recollections with regards to the matter.

I do trust Ambrotos slightly more however. Finding the post by Rogean would be awesome.

That said, if what you say is true, with Ambrotos stating his opinion on the zone not remaining a FFA, and Nilbog chiming in to state that pathing has been fixed for about a month now with no reported issues, I think the more important question is not why was training allowed when the zone was released (almost 2 whole years ago) but rather why is training STILL allowed despite all these fixes, and how do we get it's status reevaluated?'

Would be awesome if someone of authority could offer some insight (Nilbog/Rogean/Sirken).
  #3  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:33 AM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

Tasslehofp99 needs to work on his reading comprehension.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #4  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:37 AM
Rhuma7 Rhuma7 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Default

I will throw this in from the server rules as well with some bolding to reinforce the thread.

Quote:
Q: What if our raid is disrupted? What if our raid interferes with another raid?
A: You may petition in game and if a staff member is available we will be more than happy to show up and evaluate the situation as it occurs. If a staff member is unavailable then please feel free to submit your petition under petitions/exploits on the forums at www.project1999.org. please be sure to include all relevant fraps & screenshots that you feel build your case. Players are not permitted to take the law into their own hands. You are not batman and two wrongs do not make a right, therefore killstealing or general douchebaggery are not permitted under any circumstances. ever.
  #5  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:37 AM
Faerie Faerie is offline
Planar Protector

Faerie's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,178
Default

I feel that training should be allowed on blue, but not on red. On blue all you can really do is train each other, and on red we have other means of pvping. Namely pvp.
__________________
"Pleasure writes fewer good songs..."

Red99
  #6  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:49 AM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

Angering me would be another one of your misconceptions. It takes a lot to get me angry. You're just seeing me facepalming due to having to explain something multiple times. People may even get banned when I get angry, and that happens like... once a year? I dunno.

Anywho, just saying like it is. And if you read my disclaimer again I did say I wasn't stating the rule couldn't be changed. I just wanted to correct aforementioned misconception.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #7  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:50 AM
Rhuma7 Rhuma7 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 171
Default

It would be pretty funny if the rule was revoked and if a guild trained another guild in VP all their keys would be deleted [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Think twice before being a douchebag lol

If I was owner of p99, I wonder if the population would love or hate me?
  #8  
Old 08-04-2013, 03:03 AM
Gaffin Deeppockets Gaffin Deeppockets is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 285
Default

No training allowed. Makes it better place for everyone.
  #9  
Old 08-04-2013, 03:06 AM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

I honestly think it should be open to discussion again. It just doesn't make sense that training would be allowed in any zones with the current state of the server. Whether it is FE,IB,TMO or whomever it is.. It's just interfering with a raid instead of racing for targets. I mean if another guild beats you to the target you can just train them to get it ? Variance was put in for a reason to make it a competition...a race. FTE shouts are now in game to let people know who won the race. Training at this point seems to be a mechanic that allows the slower guild in each race in VP to still win the target with interference... That doesn't really fit in the spirit of competition. I mean I understand if it stays in... It just doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of the mechanics introduced to the game.

Just my 2 cents.
Last edited by Vianna; 08-04-2013 at 03:15 AM..
  #10  
Old 08-04-2013, 03:27 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vianna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I honestly think it should be open to discussion again. It just doesn't make sense that training would be allowed in any zones with the current state of the server. Whether it is FE,IB,TMO or whomever it is.. It's just interfering with a raid instead of racing for targets. I mean if another guild beats you to the target you can just train them to get it ? Variance was put in for a reason to make it a competition...a race. FTE shouts are now in game to let people know who won the race. Training at this point seems to be a mechanic that allows the slower guild in each race in VP to still win the target with interference... That doesn't really fit in the spirit of competition. I mean I understand if it stays in... It just doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of the mechanics introduced to the game.

Just my 2 cents.
Couldnt have said it better myself, I agree with you on the fact that it may be time to revisit this discussion as a server. Maybe we can work out a system which makes more sense and supports the mantra of classic everquest we all love.

I mean its silly to me people bring up stuff like item links and /makeleader yet discussions regarding training in VP never happen and if they do trolls are on it like flies to a bag of shit.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.