The Fraud of Evolution Exposed

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So by your logic, since nobody has ever seen Earth's tectonic plates move more than a few feet, so clearly it doesn't happen. Very slow processes by their very nature would not be observed in the last few hundred/thousand years of human observation.

Regardless, there are literally thousands of cases of observed adaptation in both plants and animals. I mean, do you eat or are you aware of this thing called corn? Ever seen a cat or a dog?

Um no. What you said doesn't even make much sense. If we can see the tectonic plates moving, how can anyone say it doesn't happen? That's a bad analogy against my point. Just because a process is slow doesn't mean it can't be observed. However not once has anyone observed anything even remotely close to one species becoming another entirely or even beginning to show the signs of becoming another species entirely. With the billions of different life forms alive today you would think there would be COUNTLESS examples of this but there isn't.

Adaptation is the only part of evolution that is true. Sure things can adapt but there is a literal barrier within the genetic code itself that makes it impossible for any single life form to change beyond a certain degree. This is known as genetic homeostasis. Showing how bacteria becomes resistant to antiobiotics does not in anyway shape or form mean that the same bacteria will eventually become another type of organism entirely. This is what has NEVER been observed, reproduced or been seen to occur in anyway shape or form.

Where are the fossils and evidence of transitional forms? There are literally billions of life forms on the planet so there should be so much evidence, evolutionists wouldn't even know what to do with it all. There isn't a single example of all of existence showing one type of species becoming another.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Um no. What you said doesn't even make much sense.

He prefaced his statement with "By your logic". He captured your logic accurately so the fact what he said doesn't make sense is really your failing.

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your understand of science is pseudo.

And your understand of English is completely retarded.

[Illuzionz]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He prefaced his statement with "By your logic". He captured your logic accurately so the fact what he said doesn't make sense is really your failing.

No, his analogy had no resemblance to my logic, hence why it doesn't make sense.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And your understand of English is completely retarded.

Quoting that so you can laugh at yourself

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, his analogy had no resemblance to my logic, hence why it doesn't make sense.

Your post had no resemblance to logic.

[OMGWTF420]

lol @ the nerds who believe in imaginary cloud men and bronze age mythology. good job at being completely fucking retarded

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Illuzionz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Um no. What you said doesn't even make much sense. If we can see the tectonic plates moving, how can anyone say it doesn't happen? That's a bad analogy against my point. Just because a process is slow doesn't mean it can't be observed. However not once has anyone observed anything even remotely close to one species becoming another entirely or even beginning to show the signs of becoming another species entirely. With the billions of different life forms alive today you would think there would be COUNTLESS examples of this but there isn't.

Adaptation is the only part of evolution that is true. Sure things can adapt but there is a literal barrier within the genetic code itself that makes it impossible for any single life form to change beyond a certain degree. This is known as genetic homeostasis. Showing how bacteria becomes resistant to antiobiotics does not in anyway shape or form mean that the same bacteria will eventually become another type of organism entirely. This is what has NEVER been observed, reproduced or been seen to occur in anyway shape or form.

Where are the fossils and evidence of transitional forms? There are literally billions of life forms on the planet so there should be so much evidence, evolutionists wouldn't even know what to do with it all. There isn't a single example of all of existence showing one type of species becoming another.

You do realize that evolution is simply a very long process of small changes, right? It's not like a monkey gives birth to a human being or something, which you seem to think. And we have witnessed many of these small changes which eventually lead to a much larger change. I mean, you do realize that scottish terriers are descended from wolves, right?

And my example of plate tectonics is exactly right for this case. We witness small changes (earthquakes that move plates a few feet, individual adaptations in animals) and infer long-term consequences of those changes (large scale plate movement and evolution).

[Illuzionz]

I mean, you do realize that scottish terriers are descended from wolves, right?

Actually no they aren't. Dogs are descended from wild dogs. If evolution were true, animals of all kinds would be able to interbreed but the reality is only extremely alike creatures can breed and even then most of them won't produce fertile off spring. This seems extremely contradictory to evolution since you would think it would be all about the intermingling of different species.

Aside from that, there's also the fact of symbiotic relationships in nature. Bee's are the greatest example for sure since many plants cannot even exist if bee's did not exist to pollinate them and the bee's couldn't exist if there weren't flowers for them to pollinate. So how could one have ever existed without the other? It's a literal impossibility. They both had to have existed at the same exact moment and the same exact place. Literally impossible. Not with God though, with him nothing is impossible.

[Orruar]

[QUOTE=Illuzionz;1187708If evolution were true, animals of all kinds would be able to interbreed but the reality is only extremely alike creatures can breed and even then most of them won't produce fertile off spring. This seems extremely contradictory to evolution since you would think it would be all about the intermingling of different species.[/QUOTE]

I'd love to hear the logic behind this theory of yours. Actually, I wouldn't. I prefer to have hope in humanity. So I'll just concede to you that some magical man in the sky created the earth and everything on it about 6000 years ago. You're totally right.