GG DA

[Icecometus]

Originally Posted by President [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please, Please, Please Dev's/GM's. I will buy you each a round of beers.

- Remove spawn variances

- Add in simulated patch days

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] all in good time Pres.

[Skope]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. Flat out wrong. So congratulations, you fall under Category Cry Section Fail.


Don't assume what we can and can't do because live/peq/your local box can or can't do it.

I'm not gonna ask how, and frankly for the benefit of the server i wish that's never found out. If, though, it's the same way it happened last time to the same guild then I can tell you anyone with more than 2 brain cells and those cheats installed can get by it.

Make no mistake, the motivation for it and the reason we're even seeing it is because of the variance. It played no (little) part during poopsock days because of the 1 minute 15 to responsd rule that was implemented. You don't have that buffer anymore.

If there is a way to catch them then thank god, but i hope it's not just hot air.

[Kassel]

where people download cheats and can have a *huge* upper hand on the competition because of it.

If a ranger can do it is not a huge benefit ! =D

[Icecometus]

Zing.

[Uthgaard]

Originally Posted by Skope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not gonna ask how, and frankly for the benefit of the server i wish that's never found out. If, though, it's the same way it happened last time to the same guild then I can tell you anyone with more than 2 brain cells and those cheats installed can get by it.

Make no mistake, the motivation for it and the reason we're even seeing it is because of the variance. It played no (little) part during poopsock days because of the 1 minute 15 to responsd rule that was implemented. You don't have that buffer anymore.

If there is a way to catch them then thank god, but i hope it's not just hot air.

People can think they're getting away with it all they want. We have a very small development staff. I think you should know from personal experience that even though it takes time to get to, given that this is all done in spare time, that it will eventually be investigated. Rogean is a really clever developer, and I spend at least one day a week going through logs manually.

If we weren't able to catch it, you wouldn't see nearly so many angry people on the forums right now.

[Yam]

First they came for the cheaters
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a cheater

Then they came for the assholes
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't an asshole

Then they came for the whiners
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a whiner

Then they came for for me
and there wasn't anyone left to speak up.

Oh no wait you're dumb.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by Chanus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You should ban anyone they've ever grouped or traded with as well. Maybe everyone who's ever been in the same zone at the same time just to be safe.

Nuke from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

[Rogean]

Tactical Nuke Inbound...

Wait what game are we playing again?

[Noser]

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Swell plan there buddy, ban the accounts of people that don't cheat but had guildmates that were cheating. Great idea.

If you are against punishment by association then why is the entire guild being punished because of one member. Just curious.

[sobchak123]

So if some random member of some raiding guild breaks the rules in lower guk, trains some people or whatever, you gonna ban/suspend his entire guild from raiding too?