Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2010, 12:52 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

In terms of fairness though, we could probably impliment a few systems.. like still being pvp'able after guildremoving until you zone, etc.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #2  
Old 09-02-2010, 05:44 PM
Otto Otto is offline
Fire Giant

Otto's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In terms of fairness though, we could probably impliment a few systems.. like still being pvp'able after guildremoving until you zone, etc.
Changing/dropping tags should not stop you from being killed, that's for sure.

I'm down for coin loot and inventory loot, but no equipment loot. Hell, even equipment loot would be fun, but griefing would probably be a bit too intense with all the little tiffs some individuals have.

Whatever works out, I'm pretty sure I'll be in non-stop guild war status... if not close to it.
  #3  
Old 09-02-2010, 12:54 PM
Alawen Everywhere Alawen Everywhere is offline
Banned


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 414
Default

All of the guildhopping stuff was part of the guildwar mechanic. The solution to it is that you screenshot them to show what pussies they are. On Sullon Zek, two of the evil teams went at it (<Nine> and <Infest Next> or something like that on the second one) and it led to the destruction of the latter guild as all the victims jumped ship. It was awesome.
  #4  
Old 09-02-2010, 01:02 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

I'd rather see the system tuned to something thats fair, competitive, and fun, rather than just implimenting it as was and have it be fun for a week before people get tired of it because of everyone circumventing mechanics.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #5  
Old 09-02-2010, 01:04 PM
...Raren ...Raren is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd rather see the system tuned to something thats fair, competitive, and fun, rather than just implimenting it as was and have it be fun for a week before people get tired of it because of everyone circumventing mechanics.
Well if you want it to be fair make sure you give DA a handicap. They will need it aginst IB. Make all the clerics in DA immune to getting owned i heard they all suck [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 09-02-2010, 02:10 PM
Overcast Overcast is offline
Sarnak

Overcast's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cincinnati OH Area
Posts: 375
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd rather see the system tuned to something thats fair, competitive, and fun, rather than just implimenting it as was and have it be fun for a week before people get tired of it because of everyone circumventing mechanics.
Yes, please...

I mean it's awesome to be 'classic' - but damn, some mechanics - classic or not, were just fuckin' broke.

It can still be 'classic' and 'fixed'. Question can be in this whole 'classic' concept - do we mean "classic" as in JUST the way it was, or "classic" as in the original 'vision' of the game. I vote for the latter.

"Classic" as in Original EQ, but if something was broke and not fixed by sony because they just didn't want to... well, it would have been cool to see that stuff fixed back then.

Hey - couldn't you 'lock' guild invites during a 'guildwar'?

Then the guild leaders would need to '/guildpeace' or whatever to invite people again. Or somehow stop re-invites at least, during a guild war. Locking it completely wouldn't be fair to people who want to join up then.

Or maybe - they only get unflagged *if* the guild stops the war *or* they visit the 'priest of order'?

So if they disband from the guild, during an in-progress 'guildwar' - they have to run to the Priest of Order.

Dunno, just more bad ideas to annoy people.
__________________
  #7  
Old 09-02-2010, 02:19 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

The majority of people using this command will be people that raid in a normal non-guildwar'd guild for a few hours a day, then hop into a secondary guildwar guild during the rest of their play time. I want to support this play style while at the same time make it non-abusable. This means that there will be no locks or timers on guild invites and whatnot.

Currently my ideas are:

You will remain pvp towards opposing guilds even after guildremoving.. they will still show up red to you and you will still show up red to them. If you join a guild immedietely afterwards, you will also inherit that guild's guildwar flags (So potentially you could be pvp'able to both your current guild and former guild). I'm still unsure how we want to handle guild invites though, as it would then be easy to gather several people, give them invite windows, then all accept at once to gank someone. Looking at ideas for that.

I'm also considering making it so that immedietely after dieing you will not be pvp flagged. Until when I'm not sure, probably either zoning or looting your corpse and then zoning. This will prevent two things.. one, not getting bind camped, and two, not bind rushing.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #8  
Old 09-02-2010, 02:36 PM
Sarkov Sarkov is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 84
Default

Excuse a question from someone who only played on RZ/SZ... What are the death penalties for dying in pvp on blue servers? Coin loot? CR only?

@Rogean - simple solution to the "join & gank", along the same lines as what you proposed for /guildremoving... only allow pvp toggle to flip when zoning. So, if you join a guild you don't inherit their pvp flags until you zone.
  #9  
Old 09-02-2010, 02:37 PM
...Raren ...Raren is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The majority of people using this command will be people that raid in a normal non-guildwar'd guild for a few hours a day, then hop into a secondary guildwar guild during the rest of their play time. I want to support this play style while at the same time make it non-abusable. This means that there will be no locks or timers on guild invites and whatnot.

Currently my ideas are:

You will remain pvp towards opposing guilds even after guildremoving.. they will still show up red to you and you will still show up red to them. If you join a guild immedietely afterwards, you will also inherit that guild's guildwar flags (So potentially you could be pvp'able to both your current guild and former guild). I'm still unsure how we want to handle guild invites though, as it would then be easy to gather several people, give them invite windows, then all accept at once to gank someone. Looking at ideas for that.

I'm also considering making it so that immedietely after dieing you will not be pvp flagged. Until when I'm not sure, probably either zoning or looting your corpse and then zoning. This will prevent two things.. one, not getting bind camped, and two, not bind rushing.
Carebear PVP sounds like a blast
  #10  
Old 09-02-2010, 02:46 PM
Taxi Taxi is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Should we impliment the /guildwar command? What guilds would use it? etc.

Kinda curious.
My main is not in a guild right now, im waiting for Kunark. But if you guys would implement this, id log right back in and find me a pvp guild.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.