![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I count about 8, about the same population as the previously failed PVP server
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Uh no that is not at all what would happen if a server was themed to have more active players 3 hours ahead or before the other.
Id be curious if half the population would be interested in that then why not. It would only allow for easier raiding/grouping schedules. But if there isnt a huge PST pop then nbd. But yeesh calm down. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
I'm hoping they restrict logging onto both from the same IP.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
we are going to end up with 3 servers of 500 people
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
They said that merging back of the servers could be as soon as 2 weeks, longer such as a year, or never, depending on populations. Think of it like zone instances, except it's the whole server that is "instanced" but will move back to a single one when the time makes sense.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
What about the issue of doubling up the items on the server if the merge happens far down the road?
Having decked out characters everywhere you turn really lessens the classic aspect. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, have you seen the blue server? You call all those twinks running around classic? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I would have liked to see the faster spawn rate applied to more zones. We can spread out more if we have more viable places to xp. On release day, I was making 6 person groups for freeport trash work thanks to the increased spawn rate. It was fun. | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|