VP is now a GM intervention zone!

[Lulz Sect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lulz Sect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How can you be this slow? Your evidence is AA abilities... luclin encounters and a post dated 2009?

Are you really this dim-witted?

Find the patch message where they said "Social aggro now checks against invis status", indicating a change to trivialize pulling for raid zones/encounters was uncharacteristically put into place.

I'm not surprised TMO is quick to defend their pull method for VP, nor should anyone else be.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Find the patch message where they said "Social aggro now checks against invis status", indicating a change to trivialize pulling for raid zones/encounters was uncharacteristically put into place.

I'm not surprised TMO is quick to defend their pull method for VP, nor should anyone else be.

The earliest patch notes i found on those links was 2006...... unless there is something that pertains to classic EQ keep trying.

[Harrison]

That is irrelevant for the most part.

You guys are exploiting a bug in the mechanics on EQemu by pulling the way you are.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The earliest patch notes i found on those links was 2006...... unless there is something that pertains to classic EQ keep trying.

No, I'm saying, go search the entire patch notes archive history for your supposed change where SoE benevolently and uncharacteristically made pulling raid encounters/zones easier by adding a invis check upon social aggro prior to the excerpts I've posted.

When a direct aggro mob calls for help (i.e. a VP named), on Live it passed its hate list to social aggro mobs who are also KOS (i.e. wurms and racnars). However, to note, mobs who are social aggro couldn't "call for help", only the direct aggro mob. Not sure if this piece works correctly on P99 either.

You are making things up and grasping at straws to hold onto your DoT/COTH/Invis no social aggro pull tactics in VP.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Find the patch message where they said "Social aggro now checks against invis status", indicating a change to trivialize pulling for raid zones/encounters was uncharacteristically put into place.

I'm not surprised TMO is quick to defend their pull method for VP, nor should anyone else be.

it's not just our pulling method in VP.

What you are talking about, effects the entire server. The pulling method is very similar to pulling methods used for tons of other places.

I also remember a few people saying they pulled the dragons in classic in a similar fashion as how we currently pull them.

It's not exactly like ours, but the methods are similar. If you change the way it works for one, you change it for all.

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's not just our pulling method in VP.

What you are talking about, effects the entire server. The pulling method is very similar to pulling methods used for tons of other places.

I also remember a few people saying they pulled the dragons in classic in a similar fashion as how we currently pull them.

It's not exactly like ours, but the methods are similar. If you change the way it works for one, you change it for all.

I fully understand that.

[Enygma]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Find the patch message where they said "Social aggro now checks against invis status", indicating a change to trivialize pulling for raid zones/encounters was uncharacteristically put into place.

I'm not surprised TMO is quick to defend their pull method for VP, nor should anyone else be.

I'm not surprised Yendor's a retard and thought membluring wasn't an exploit.

True story.

[Harrison]

Again with the "BUT BUT BUT THEY DO X! WHY WE IN TROUBLE FOR Y?!"

You guys are nearing Red99's level of stupidity in responses when caught cheating.