![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() VP is supposed to be a non GM intervention zone.
We all understand this. Thus when TMO was told "Yes, Memblur is not working as intended. Its CHing mobs. Its an exploit. But since its VP we won't interfere" that was taken to be fine. We dealt with it for weeks. http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...emblur&page=10 We can show the staff proof the server dynamics are messed up with Pathing - ALL zones are off let alone VP. Regardless of that you decide bad pathing is a reason to dictate where we can and can't pull mobs to in VP? Was memblur not an exploit? According to Nil it was broken and never meant to be that way - and they're going to fix it. Yet for weeks beforehand VD was allowed to continue to use memblur - but only in VP. Anywhere else would get them banned but VP is VP - a supposedly non intervention zone. So that exploit was just fine by you. Why do you allow one guild to use a known exploit for weeks on end yet after watching pulls for a little bit you decide that this "Exploit" (server mechanics thanks) is too overpowered and thus our VP pulls need to be GM dictated - who, what, where, when, why and sometimes how! If you consider it an exploit - talk to the developers. Speak to Nil. Have em fix it - like they did/will do with Memblur. That will stop us from using what you consider an exploit. Instead of taking this same path you took with VD when they used a confirmed exploit for weeks (Its VP! Anything goes! Let the Devs fix it if its an exploit was your attitude) you take it upon yourself to declare bad pathing an exploit, declare where we can and can't pull to and then when people challenge you with logic and rationale you lock the thread. Welcome to GM moderated VP. http://www.project1999.org/forums/showt ... post591221 | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() This faggot needs a tissue
| ||
|
#4
|
|||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
hey baub why dont you ask daliant and zilo how much they enjoy thier new home? jjejejeejejeee | ||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() VP is a non GM intervention zone as far as raid interference goes.
It doesn't give you a pass for exploiting or for trivializing raid content. nice try though. If you think i'm being unfair then please feel free to PM nilbog and/or rogean. and / or myself. however i can tell you all that sitting here in public hurling insults and being disrespectful just doesn't give me the warm fuzzy feeling of "Gee, you are right" Sooo quit putting words in my mouth. and re-read what i said. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
.
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() So Amelinda, is it ok to pull a dragon into the picture room, making sure it stays out of walls on the way there, and then pulling it from the picture room to the upper ledge? Or would this still be considered "exploiting" and "trivializing" content??
Also, I'm sure you know this already, but the reason there are never any adds on the pull has everything to do with hide, and nothing to do with where the dragon paths. It could path on top of every mob in the zone and still come single, because the player it is coming for is hidden.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() Did IB go emo and goto eqmac? God help anyone on p99 let alone gd eqmac lol
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() Amelinda, youve made a mistake. Take my word for it.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|