Let's not forget that the US is responsible for similar acts of terror.

Rjones61 · #1 04-16-2013, 04:00 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-wedding.html

I am a United States citizen. I'm not saying the people in the marathon deserved any of what happened. They are not the ones at fault. Violence begets violence.

Sirken · #2 04-16-2013, 04:06 PM

yea. because a bomb missing it's target and unintentionally landing on a wedding is the same thing as strategically placing bombs filled with BBs and other shrapnel at key locations in an attempt maximize civilian casualties.

dumbs gonna dumb.

mwllowyellow2 · #3 04-16-2013, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rjones61 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-wedding.html

I am a United States citizen. I'm not saying the people in the marathon deserved any of what happened. They are not the ones at fault. Violence begets violence.

Are you really this fucking stupid? How can you compare the two events that happened, one being an accident, the bomb was supposed to hit a headquarters. While the other was placed to kill innocent people. Please ban this moron.

Rjones61 · #4 04-16-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mwllowyellow2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you really this fucking stupid? How can you compare the two events that happened, one being an accident, the bomb was supposed to hit a headquarters. While the other was placed to kill innocent people. Please ban this moron.

Ban me for being controversial? Okay. So if a country came out and said, "Sorry, it was an accident" it would be hunky dorey?

OforOppression · #5 04-16-2013, 04:33 PM

theres a difference between a stray bullet hitting an innocent and spraying full auto into a crowd of people

Swish · #6 04-16-2013, 04:35 PM

Ban him for linking a Daily Mail article, that newspaper has a terrible reputation here [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rjones61 · #7 04-16-2013, 04:39 PM

How about this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LF9P5...has_verified=1

feanan · #8 04-16-2013, 04:55 PM

I hear where you are coming from.

Everything is always ok when the US does it. Want to detain people forever with no charges and no court? No problem. Want to spy on and kill your own citizens? No biggie. Want to send drones into foreign countries where innocents are killed every day? Well, cost of the war on terror.

Feel free to google US drones killing innocents.

But hey, its ok, we're america!

feanan · #9 04-16-2013, 04:56 PM

"TBIJ reports that from June 2004 through mid-September 2012, available data indicate that drone strikes killed 2,562 - 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom 474 - 881 were civilians, including 176 children. TBIJ reports that these strikes also injured an additional 1,228 - 1,362 individuals," according to the Stanford/NYU study.

Based on interviews with witnesses, victims and experts, the report accuses the CIA of "double-striking" a target, moments after the initial hit, thereby killing first responders.

Sirken · #10 04-16-2013, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feanan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hear where you are coming from.

Everything is always ok when the US does it. Want to detain people forever with no charges and no court? No problem. Want to spy on and kill your own citizens? No biggie. Want to send drones into foreign countries where innocents are killed every day? Well, cost of the war on terror.

Feel free to google US drones killing innocents.

But hey, its ok, we're america!

im not saying the US is innocent in all their actions.

im saying the OP's link and story being compared to what happened in boston yesterday is beyond retarded.