SZ ruleset -+5 LvL PvP?

[Lu|z Sect]

Evil FFA
Newt
Good

Why are we making this more complicated than it has to be?

[Syft]

Originally Posted by Lu|z Sect [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Evil FFA
Newt
Good

Why are we making this more complicated than it has to be?

I like one team FFA but evil might make the team too large.

I might go with

Good
Newt FFA(can't make guilds can only join them, can group with either team)
Evil

[Rec]

How about a level range but if you attack someone on a team you open yourself up to be attacked by anyone from that team. This way we still get the freedom of the sz ruleset to combat super geared twinks which are the real threat to any new player population, with the safety of a level range.

[Rust1d?]

Evil - Can attack all
Neut - Can attack all
Good - Can attack all but good

+/- 5 levels for pvp

No item loot or just rings/earings

[Nirgon]

Did people become retarded over night

[Lu|z Sect]

What do you suggest Dr. EQ?

[Nirgon]

Drink tons of cough medicine and train people's binds braw

[Rust1d?]

So what you suggest is that teams within teams can attack each other? What is the point of teams if goods can just attack each other. We would be back to FFA again.

+/- 4-6 levels for pvp should work

[Nirgon]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lu|z Sect]

Don't dodge Me doctor. Really want your opinion.