Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2010, 01:00 AM
Tokum-6n0m3 Tokum-6n0m3 is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 151
Default Warrior Agro----

Ok unlike a lot of other post I see im not complaining about taunt, it seems very close to what i remember of live back in 99....however my problem is this...

Everyone on this server swears by proc weapons for agro (and yes in live proc weapons were better then non-procing weapons) HOWEVER I can clearly remember playing on my warrior pre-kunark on live with no Fbss, mostly bronze, and 2 decent (6/22 no proc) weapons at lvl 25 and being able to hold agro with relative ease. On here I can have 2 obsidian shards a Fbss full suit of crafted and at lvl25 im having to FIGHT MY ASS OFF to obtain agro unless i get a proc or 2.......

Also from my understanding of raiding later on (on this server), a warrior HAS to have 2yaks to have ANY chance of holding agro, this as stated before was something on live that people preferred but there were plenty of cases of warriors using 2 fast weapons such as thullian claws, and electric bladed wakusi (or however its spelled) and holding agro ALMOST as good as the tanks with 2 yaks......I will admit that a warrior with 2 yaks did hold agro better then the warrior using non-proc fast weapons, however on this server the warrior with the fast weapons will generate little to no agro at all.........this seems severely broke to me.

Now you can blame this on DPS that don't wait to dps but Ive had healers pull agro off me with a single heal and the mob already at 60% cause I had yet to proc with a weapon (this case it was just me and the healer,so i had done 40% of dmg already to the mob) this was another clue to me.

I know a lot of people complain about taunt being broke being the reason warriors are broken and where as it might not work like it does currently in live, it seems to work just like it did in classic....

I think the reason people feel like its broke is cause they're playing the same class they did back then, using the same fast/dps based weapons that gave them "good enough" agro back in the day, just arn't cutting it anymore. Because to them the dps output seems the same, they assume the threat generated is the same......so only answer is= taunt must be broke.

I feel like some hidden threat modifier that affects EVERY hit a warrior makes, is missing from the equation or its set to low.....

Maybe im wrong, but something definitely FEELS wrong to me.....worth looking into......hope everyone doesn't flame me to bad for this :x
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-2010, 02:26 AM
omgmo omgmo is offline
Orc


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 47
Default

You should also consider that many other classes have broken mechanics that affect their aggro generation, which can make things look worse than they are for a tank (not to say that warriors are fine). Slows and mez's seem to cause a ridiculous amount of hate, memblur's seem to be ineffective, sitting appears to cause no extra aggro, the list goes on. I'm not sure we'll ever see an exact replica of how everything once worked, as all we have to go on are people's memories - and the flaw in that is endless.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2010, 05:00 PM
Gorroth Gorroth is offline
Kobold

Gorroth's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 155
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omgmo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You should also consider that many other classes have broken mechanics that affect their aggro generation, which can make things look worse than they are for a tank (not to say that warriors are fine). Slows and mez's seem to cause a ridiculous amount of hate, memblur's seem to be ineffective, sitting appears to cause no extra aggro, the list goes on.
This. It's been brought up a few times for different spells (mez/slow/malise) but I don't think a dev ever answered any concerns about aggro being broken so I wouldn't hold my breath for any kind of fix. It definitely doesn't feel right though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2010, 02:44 AM
rainingvodka rainingvodka is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 25
Default

sit does cause extra aggro. i'm sitting in upper guk right now. i killed a green mob standing next to another green mob that didn't assist at all. the second i sat down that non assisting mob attacked me.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2010, 01:50 PM
Mmohunter Mmohunter is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rainingvodka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
sit does cause extra aggro. i'm sitting in upper guk right now. i killed a green mob standing next to another green mob that didn't assist at all. the second i sat down that non assisting mob attacked me.
When any PC sits it registers as a lvl 1 PC, that's why any mob which is KoS will attack you no matter the level. This information went public years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2010, 11:36 PM
rainingvodka rainingvodka is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmohunter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When any PC sits it registers as a lvl 1 PC, that's why any mob which is KoS will attack you no matter the level. This information went public years ago.
interesting. i never saw that. got any links?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2010, 12:43 AM
Ahnen Ahnen is offline
Orc


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 44
Default

Regarding sitting and agro: I seem to remember sitting at the entrance to Plane of Hate being a huge no no because it would agro certain mobs through the wall. Maybe someone remembers this better or more accurately than I do. I hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-03-2010, 10:57 AM
Zallarenya Zallarenya is offline
Aviak

Zallarenya's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 51
Default

Something else I've noticed: In Classic, most people weren't as focused on, for lack of a better term, being top of the damage meters. We knew that we had to give the tank a little bit to get aggro before going all in. I finally got too tired of rogues jumping in behind the mobs on the pull, before it even got to me, and backstabbing (OMGWTF YOU SUCK GET THIS OFF ME!), and just shelved my warrior.
__________________
Baryon Cleric
Ailean Warrior
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-04-2010, 02:26 PM
fishingme fishingme is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zallarenya [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Something else I've noticed: In Classic, most people weren't as focused on, for lack of a better term, being top of the damage meters. We knew that we had to give the tank a little bit to get aggro before going all in. I finally got too tired of rogues jumping in behind the mobs on the pull, before it even got to me, and backstabbing (OMGWTF YOU SUCK GET THIS OFF ME!), and just shelved my warrior.
+1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-04-2010, 02:31 PM
Dantes Dantes is offline
Fire Giant

Dantes's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 808
Default

It's hard to base these assumptions off memories that are 10 years old. I remember plenty of times during live being the last one alive in my group after a wipe because I couldn't get aggro.
__________________
Dantes Infernus
57th Level Champion of Rallos Zek

"Life's short and hard like a body building elf."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.