|
View Poll Results: PvP Bracket System Instead of +/- level range 46+ ONLY | |||
2 brackets, 46-52 and 53-60. Still need to flag some zones FFA. | 7 | 17.50% | |
1 bracket, 46-60 | 7 | 17.50% | |
Naw | 26 | 65.00% | |
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
Bracket based PvP Idea
So the basic idea is to elminate the whole "are we all in range to soandso" and other problems. I offer two solutions. This does not apply to 1-45 as these levels don't matter.
Solution 1, two brackets. 46-52 entry level end game 53-60 end game Only level ranges within these brackets could pvp each other. Meaning a 45 couldnt attack a 46 or vice versa. This would allow newer guilds to progress and establish themselves before hitting 53. Only problem with this solution is that you would still have to enable FFA in certain zones such as Sebilis and Planes. Solution 2, one end game bracket 46-60 Eliminates all confusion as to where you stand. Eliminates the need to FFA any zone (unless level 1s can goto Seb or what not.) Eliminates almost all of the OOR low level farmers. Significantly increases pvp. Downside is that this could lead to a lot more grief if guilds aren't willing to fortify their leveling zones. Personally I think solution 2 is the best idea as its simple and serves a purpose.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Brackets work better because everyone who belongs in a given zone should be able to kill everyone else who belongs in that zone. I suggested using who you can group with as the range simply because it's extremely easy and I miss the good old FFA days. FFA with teams would be kickass. But brackets are easy and they work.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
why not just code it so that if you attack a group, that entire group can choose to join in or just watch?
__________________
Edalse Dwarf Cleric
Eslade Dwarf Paladin (Cazic Thule Server)#elfpals discord | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
i chose brackets for the simple reason as they are simple. 1-45 is leveling. 46+ is competing. if you can complete your epic and travel to the planes, you are a big boy now. they should also make YT 46+ already. this would help with low level griefing and also the crushbone leaderboard would actually reflect end game pvp going down. it would knock out a flock of birds with one stone.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | |||
Last edited by SamwiseRed; 07-14-2015 at 01:26 PM..
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
why not just make it any spell that you cast on another player flags you as soon as you start casting?
__________________
Edalse Dwarf Cleric
Eslade Dwarf Paladin (Cazic Thule Server)#elfpals discord | ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Edalse Dwarf Cleric
Eslade Dwarf Paladin (Cazic Thule Server)#elfpals discord | |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I am still not sure what you are going for. So if a level 9 Shaman gives a level 60 sow that is in a group, they should be flagged for level 60 pvp? Same with binding someone? Porting? Rezzing? There are so many situations where that would be retarded without the system being extreme complicated.
46-60 should be a seperate bracket for pvp. Should be the only level ranges that produce YT. No more which zone should or should not be FFA. I mean I am open for other suggestions such a 50-60 or at the very least 53-60.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
Last edited by SamwiseRed; 07-14-2015 at 02:34 PM..
|
|
|
|