#1
|
|||||
|
Ted Cruz the 'Anointed King'
TED CRUZ BELIEVES HE IS AN ‘ANOINTED KING’ TO BRING ABOUT THE “END TIMES WEALTH TRANSFER”
TED CRUZ “ANOINTED” TO “BRING THE SPOILS OF WAR TO THE PRIESTS” Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I feel like I should return to my patriarchal role in society and fucking bomb the fuck out of ya'll from high orbit. (with nukes cauze fuck an ecosphere that creates humans)
(P.S. OP is not triggering me) I'm just helping this thread get rolling. | ||
Last edited by maerilith; 03-02-2016 at 12:22 PM..
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
Hah, nice try! Godless Japan has embraced rather stringent mosaic law across their pristine society. They even apply it to pornography and nothing had has happened to them.
They'd have known higher greatness yet had their god not listened to the foolish yearnings of his most astute disciples. Theocracy is only ever an issue when your god cedes control to men. You lose by anecdote.
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Cruzman Sachs for President of Israel and Fetuses 2016.
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
The article says he is because he isn't and needs to make some case one way or another so lets make a conspiracy by using his fathers words whatever they may mean. Sure he is a king, King Ted! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] He is a king and a priest, as all Christians are called in the bible. Nothing new there with that, not a conspiracy.
Dominionism is kind of a loose term, more of a political thing as often used, especially among evangelicals, favorable of the neocons but not excluding others. Includes a lot of conservative Catholics, even Reagan Democrats can be tossed in there. Though there are dominionist theologians, which even those views can vary however, though often end in antisemitism; some call it replacement theology in those cases. But the loose term of dominionism in politics isn't that, it's just more about western values. For some though, it can be both, political and theological. Between Ted and Donald, Donald is probably more likely of that by the church he goes to, theological dominionism, which his church is Presbyterian. He even stuttered regarding the question of a two-state solution for Israel, which if so would put him more in align with his church's views. Ted is opposite though, in that he says that the US shouldn't be involved in the Israel/Palestinian negotiations. There is a big difference there, much like Rand and Ron not wanting involvement, which a lot of people don't understand but then misrepresent. Whatever Ted's personal views are, he's a constitutionalist. I mean as long as he sticks to that, he can believe what he wants, I don't care. All the problems we are in are from presidents that have been using the constitution as reach-around (TP). From all the wars to all the divisions in the nation, this is a constitutional problem, or lack thereof. Dems no different. You libs are freaking out if you don't get your damn wars too.
__________________
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
After searching for 10 minutes I give up. What flag is that buddy?
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Iran
__________________
<Millenial Snowfkake Utopia>
| ||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
But you libs really luv extremist islamisists, the "religion of peace" even with all their beheadings and outrageous oppression's against women that supposedly goes against the fabric of liberalism (the kings new clothes). It boggles the mind, but really doesn't since I have come to understand the mind of the lib (the ones that know what they are doing anyway), which is all about believing contradictions (double-minded). This must be part of what offends you about western values, we let our women run around in bright colors and in some cases near nekid, even let them run for office. For office! Must be frustrating for you. I have a friend that looks almost your twin, he's from Iraq [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] But he's a Catholic and his family fled the country, a conservative type.
__________________
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
comparing ted cruz to iran in an explicitly negative manner somehow resulted in that post.
take me step by step down the rabbit hole for how the fuck your brain processed it as support for either. | ||
|
|
|