![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Because he is insecure about another guild leading a PuG raid.
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() 1st
__________________
60 GrandMaster <Aftermath>
Tarew Marr former <Noble Lion> ![]() | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() or maybe it's because the idea was stupid?
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() 5 lvl 50 cleric boxes and a monk contest NToV
Will they get an FTE? Will they camp out in time? Tune in to p99 blue to find out! | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() Why couldn't a server wide crawl beat Lord Bob?
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() /popcorn
__________________
| ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Kongfuzi <60 Grave Lord>
| |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() Do you think this would have worked in the reverse?
If Hyjal got all the guild leaders in a discord, had a server side aggreement to leave up NToV targets for a day for a serverwide crawl, and AM said 'fuck that', would the GM's prevent them from taking their own targets out of the pack? No. And that's why preventing Venerate from having a say is blatantly a favoritism move. But I like the idea of a server-side crawl nonetheless. I wish leadership would stop bitching like entitled children and go along with something novel and fun for everyone. Fucking fuck. | ||
|
#10
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Fucking hypocritical scrubs! | |||
|
![]() |
|
|