![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
For example, Ice Breath, cast by Lord Yelinak (https://wiki.project1999.com/Ice_Breath) has the line mentioned in the title (Resist:Magic (-200)). How do I interpret this number?
For comparison, Flash of light has Resist: Magic (0). Thank you [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
BLUE
Nadoom, Battlemage of the 60th Element Eolia Tournevent, Wanderer of the 55th Circle Dwaric McClerf, Vicar of the 51st Mass Momtaz Velocipede, Disciple of the 51st Trial RED Xeptna Stargaze, Evoker of the 54th Solstice Skraaa Katau, Shaman of the 40th Season Ashnod the Uncaring, Cleric of the 36th Sacrifice | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I believe it's saying you use magic resist to avoid that attack, but do so as if you MR was 200 less.
I should note that whenever the wiki references a number that players can't measure, you should take it with a grain of salt. The number probably comes from live data, and so it might not be the same number on our (classic-customized) server.
__________________
Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | ||
|
Last edited by loramin; 11-12-2025 at 04:34 PM..
| |||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Thanks for the reply [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In that case, does it change anything if I have 0 (effectively -200 for that spell) or 195 (effectively -5 for that spell) MR?
__________________
BLUE
Nadoom, Battlemage of the 60th Element Eolia Tournevent, Wanderer of the 55th Circle Dwaric McClerf, Vicar of the 51st Mass Momtaz Velocipede, Disciple of the 51st Trial RED Xeptna Stargaze, Evoker of the 54th Solstice Skraaa Katau, Shaman of the 40th Season Ashnod the Uncaring, Cleric of the 36th Sacrifice | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
If you have 0 MR vs 195 MR against a -200 MR spell check then yes, you are way less likely to resist it at 0 MR as opposed to 195.
For comparison, wizard "lures" are -300 checks and land very consistently, and sometimes even on monsters that are highly resistant to that type of magic (ie. lure of ice can land on ice-resistant mobs where other ice-based spells basically have no chance). Other factors at play for resist checks are mob level vs your level. Yelinak being level 70 where you are max lvl 60 makes passing that -200 check even harder. | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
The higher the negative the more like the spell is to land. Essentially you are taking the targets native resist number, subtracting the number associated with the spell and then running a resist check against that reduced number.
So for raid mobs casters are generally using either unresistable or the negative resist spells to have a greater likelihood of landing on mobs. Now not all resists are equal. So for example on a fire dragon using a -300 fire spell may not be any better than a -0 ice spell if the mob has fire resist natively that's much higher. | ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
I understand, thank you all [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
BLUE
Nadoom, Battlemage of the 60th Element Eolia Tournevent, Wanderer of the 55th Circle Dwaric McClerf, Vicar of the 51st Mass Momtaz Velocipede, Disciple of the 51st Trial RED Xeptna Stargaze, Evoker of the 54th Solstice Skraaa Katau, Shaman of the 40th Season Ashnod the Uncaring, Cleric of the 36th Sacrifice | ||
![]() |
|
|