|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
The largest peer reviewed encyclopedia in the world is not a credible source
I liked how my professors would gladly accept any random geoshitties webpage made by some crackhead who just rambled vaguely about the topic at hand in order to collect some AdSense money, but always QQ'd if I used Wikipedia.
Also Britannica, likely written by 4 old dudes with wrinkly balls, is perfectly acceptable. I mean have you even ever tried trolling Wikipedia? Those nerds revert fake shit before the page even refreshes. To be perfectly honest, there is -literally- no reason to even go to college now that Wikipedia exists except to get a shiny piece of paper that says you are only half-lazy. | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
yeah good luck learning everything a math degree will teach you using wikipedia alone.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity> Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior Project 1999 (PvP): [50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis | ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
next | |||
|
#5
|
|||
|
good luck trying to figure out how to find how to please the G-spot while simultaneously stimulating the clit using wikipedia alone
__________________
| ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
That piece of shit can't even work a goddamn word problem.
__________________
Nocte: 60 Cleric
Duchess: 60 Rogue Bizarro Nalkin: 55 Gnecromancer | |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
britannica is the worst piece of shit ive ever used to research anything. i ended up using wikipedia for my research paper on the civil war and just cited random britannica articles cause i was required to. got a B [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
| ||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
naez just got [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
im eating m&m cookies from pathmark and a huge can of roasted nuts come at me.
| ||
|
|
|