![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() Clinging darkness is being resti 80 percent of the time, this never got resti in classic.Plus the spell effect looks like blinding spell not cling darkness.
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
![]() didnt know clinging darkness was lured based
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
![]() Never got resisted...lol
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
![]() P sure the spell effect was a blind particle and .. never resisted? lol. necros had to run like chickens with their heads cut off trying to work in pet taunt and snares if the first one got resisted.
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
![]() Darkness line always had a decently high resist rate.
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
![]() Hopefully the devs just auto ignore crap without data, because a lot of people are posting some bogus recollections as "classic".
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
![]() clinging darkness had an even higher resist rate than snare, which was usually a waste of mana to cast on someone with even 70 mr
| ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
![]() nothing should be resisted 80% of the time when casted on naked players.. darkness is just one of many. resists as a whole need to be adjusted
casting 150 damage nukes on blues shouldn't result in 5 damage partials either | ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
![]() was the naked player one that can cast resistance buffs?
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|