Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: What class would you say best fits the role of "Tank"?
Warrior 58 53.21%
Paladin 18 16.51%
Shadowknight 22 20.18%
Any class can be a tank if youre l337 liek me 11 10.09%
Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:05 PM
NachtMystium NachtMystium is offline
Sarnak

NachtMystium's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 477
Default Best class for tank role?

If you HAD to choose one class that fits the role of Tank the best, what would you choose and why?

Class only, but race discussion is welcome also.

I voted Shadowknight for their superior hate acquiring abilities, but that's really my only reason since I'm not very experienced with tanks.
__________________
Last edited by NachtMystium; 11-21-2012 at 06:08 PM..
  #2  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:07 PM
Twilight-Sparkle Twilight-Sparkle is offline
Kobold

Twilight-Sparkle's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 117
Default

Warrior. No contest. Highest mitigation possible.

The race is debateable, but my vote goes to Ogres, for Slam and immunity to frontal Stun (not to mention the insanely high Str/Sta), with Barbarians a close second.
  #3  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:14 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Warriors dont have hybrid xp penalties either!
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #4  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:15 PM
NachtMystium NachtMystium is offline
Sarnak

NachtMystium's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 477
Default

Excuse my ignorance, but never have played a tank and being someone who is interested in making one soon, I would assume wearing a shield over dual-wielding /Two- Handing would be the more efficient decision? Stricly for the purpose of Tanking?
__________________
  #5  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:18 PM
Twilight-Sparkle Twilight-Sparkle is offline
Kobold

Twilight-Sparkle's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtMystium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Excuse my ignorance, but never have played a tank and being someone who is interested in making one soon, I would assume wearing a shield over dual-wielding /Two- Handing would be the more efficient decision? Stricly for the purpose of Tanking?
Depends on the class. Hybrids get an AC cap without shields, and mostly generate their threat through spells, with taunt as a backup (the Paladin epic also gets around the AC cap). Warriors have no such cap on their AC, shield or not. Warriors HAVE to rely on taunt and their weapons for aggro, and it's limited until their weapons start procing at the higher levels.

So, for Paladins and Shadowknights, 1h/shield works best, until the Pally gets their epic. Warriors should be dual wielding or 2hing at all times.
  #6  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:23 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Deleted my old post and trying again [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So obviously for a raid target the answer is warrior. For an xp group things are different.

What you have to understand is that the P1999 playerbase is insanely well geared compared to live. An untwinked melee at 55 is still going to have full planar, RBG at worst and probably a Cloak of Flames, epic if rogue or monk, sky gear, Kunark armor pieces etc. And half the melees are twinks and have even better gear than this.

Therefore generally mitigation isn't a problem. The primary issues are threat, dps, and xp penalty. Warriors clearly win at dps (although its not huge) and xp penalty, so the question is whether the (essentially perfect) aggro of a paladin or SK combined with their utility (snaring runners, extra CC, etc) compensates. And this basically depends on the warrior's gear. Because warriors got screwed epic-wise compared to rogues and monks. It's very hard for a warrior dual wielding 9/20+14/28 with 130 dex to keep aggro off a Rogue with 15/25+10/18 or a monk with 9/16+17/28. In that case I think Paladins or SKs are probably better. On the other hand, if the warrior has epic/vp weapons then I think warriors are probably better.

TL;DR: Warriors are the most gear dependent class in everquest.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #7  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:24 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtMystium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Excuse my ignorance, but never have played a tank and being someone who is interested in making one soon, I would assume wearing a shield over dual-wielding /Two- Handing would be the more efficient decision? Stricly for the purpose of Tanking?
If you do this you will not be tanking, the rogue or the shaman will.
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
  #8  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:29 PM
Twilight-Sparkle Twilight-Sparkle is offline
Kobold

Twilight-Sparkle's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you do this you will not be tanking, the rogue or the shaman will.
Paladins with Blind/Stun say hello.
  #9  
Old 11-21-2012, 06:57 PM
Ephirith Ephirith is offline
Fire Giant

Ephirith's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Korova Milk Bar
Posts: 576
Default

Monk in almost every single non-raid situation.

-Mitigation roughly the same, maybe even higher, than a Paladin or Shadowknight.
-3x as much dps as a paladin or shadow knight
-Pulling ability, mend
-Agro is more than sufficient

You basically get both a tank and a dps.

Warriors are good too.

Also, it's worth mentioning that a Ranger can be a viable compromise between a Pal/SK type tank and a monk. You get a decent amount of DPS and excellent agro management/snap agro. Rangers are incredibly squishy but in some groups that won't be a problem anyway, and it may be worth the extra agro and DPS for quick killing.
Last edited by Ephirith; 11-21-2012 at 07:05 PM..
  #10  
Old 11-21-2012, 07:52 PM
ArumTP ArumTP is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 402
Default

Paladin.

Their gear is cheap and easily available, so they tend to be better geared than any given warrior. Spell argo works better than hope and pray for a proc argo. LoH is the ultimate o shit button. Lull pulling. Heals good as druid. O shit rez.
__________________
Arum Cleric
Ticklebottom Warrior
Servilius Rogue
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.