#1
|
||||
|
Sirken's proposal
Quote:
__________________
<Azure Guard>
Flyboy Firebane - 60 shaman Faladwen Fireball- 60 wizard Mithras Firehealer - 60 cleric Gurig Fireplague - 53 necro Umphrey McGee - 55 magician Loden Arrows - 46 ranger | |||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Sirken's plan is so close to the Simple Plan with some extra clarity around the edges. It's awesome. The only thing it needs is a stipulation preventing a T2 guild from monopolizing tier 2.
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Encouraging guilds to race for FTE in a fully popped zone is not the way to keep your petition queue low.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
The first 8 days (because Derubael harbors an unhealthy vendetta against the number 7) of every month will be a "raid vacation" for all Tier 1 guilds in regards to Tier 2 mobs (ie: T1 guilds can only kill T1 mobs in the first 8 days). They can use this time to avoid burnout, help out pals, fap, or whatever as long as they aren't raiding T2 mobs. During this 8 day period only Tier 2 guilds will be allowed to raid anything they want. the rest of the month (days 9-30or31) would be a FFA for all guilds on the server.
(ie: T1 guilds can only kill T2 mobs in the first 8 days) ??? Make it 10 days. I've already proven mathematically that mobs-per-guild in this phase would be ideal and helps with the feast/famine of variance. Otherwise this is very similar to the TMO/FE original proposal with MORE mobs in T2 pool. For those that missed the logic and math: [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Again, this is more mobs-per-guild in Tier 2 than Divinity's plan and only adds MORE to their pool with Sirken's plan.
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
|||
|
5 days for T1 guilds not killing T1 mobs?
Nm my math is all jacked. I need to wake up more before I read.
__________________
| ||
Last edited by Ambrotos; 01-03-2014 at 02:00 PM..
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
make it 2
__________________
| ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
The plan unfortunately keeps the big 4 (VS, Inny, CT, Trak) Completely in the hands of only two guilds to an even higher extreme than any other proposal yet.
These mobs are the point of contention atm in the raid discussions. And are the mobs that the T2 guilds have been blocked from (in some cases just to keep them from having them) for years. A proposal that makes the majority of this content even more out of reach is not going to fly, except for two guilds maybe. Not knocking you for trying Sirken. You guys must hate this whole thing more than any of us. Fact is though is I see a proposal right now (The staff proposal posted by Rogean) that would give more than 50% of the mobs to two forces (we are talking half outside of VP plus VP, to TMO and FE/IB)... and then less than 50% (only mobs outside of VP, to *SIX* other guilds. also allowing more growth in T2 for other guilds to join and take a piece of that pie.) it doesn't allow the T1 guilds to completely dominate the "big 4" but they still get the lions share regardless. Yes im biased. but no matter how you look at it, its triple the guilds sharing a smaller piece of the pie with a complete and total concession of VP. And that is before more guilds jump in. And they are okay with it. its probably going to have to be something near this if you really want them to play ball. | ||
Last edited by -Catherin-; 01-03-2014 at 02:06 PM..
|
|
|
|