![]() |
|
#36
|
||||
|
In terms of sheer damage taken, yes - they are #2. No excuses, you had 16 years to learn that.
You're also comparing one of the stronger classes in the game versus the two weakest classes throughout EQ's history. Monks were nerfed in Luclin because Warriors complained that with the high AC on all/all gear (mostly on Velious Gear, but wasn't widely available until Luclin) combined with the minimal returns on AC above the softcap meant that monks took in less damage than non-disc'd warriors. The result was that monk avoidance was buffed and their mitigation got nerfed. Then you have Brodda Thepp's parses in PoP that showed monks were probably still taking in damage at a lower amount than Knights. Quote:
This is also ignoring important aspects of tanking like aggro which knights are undeniably superior or instant-burst mitigation which knights completely lacked (outside of paladin stuns on lower level mobs). I think it took until the Shield Block AA in OoW for knights to finally start taking in less damage than monks. TLDR: knights suck, roll a monk or warrior instead.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
|