Give me the 411 on pvp class balance plz

[Delita2]

Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Assuming anyone actually pvps enough on this box to know (LOL). I don't know how much the resist system has changed shit.


I don't give a crap about zerg pvp so lets assume 1v1 scenarios or small group skirmishes. Here are the classes I'm curious about:

Bard (do they get rooted and actually killed outdoors bc of shitty resist system? etc)
Ranger
Warrior (have some idea obv)
Necro
Druid



THANKS PALS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bard - obviously valued in group pvp, unable to do shit against anyone intelligent/geared who chooses to disengage. Not going to be fun whittleing down randoms health until they zone or just gate and laugh at you.

Ranger - no disc, no interrupt, no health (compared to other melee classes), no point. Ok in group settings if competently assisting / performing utlitiy roles such as chain pumicing, ccing pets, etc, but a poor substitute for another hybrid.

Warrior - Good gear, resists? P good w/ group, poor solo. Bad gear, bad resists? Better than ranger.

Necro - Pretty good against retards, rangers, and pure melee. Pretty bad against anyone who has channeling and cure pots/pumice, or just decides to run away since every spell takes forever to cast. Good for groups when people are too busy trying to assist train / run around to focus on pellings/curing themselves and asystole can lolsnare people with an assist train in pursuit.

Druid - its a druid.