![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
![]() so I was thinking about the whole "you cannot bind at pots" argument.
I understand that it can be abused, but here's my counter-argument. Is anything stopping players from just killing themselves there and having a "stored corpse" for clerics to revive as a form of "bind" ?[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] With all the druid rings, magicians, and other teleporting shenanigans out there, it seems kinda silly that the few classes that could use this the most (those without teleports but with bind) are restricted from this the most. tl;dr - give enchanters the right to bind self at pots so that we can all be happy. (i'll probably still keep trying to think up ways to screw with pots otherwise, until it becomes easier to use, like druid ports.) anyways, my real question is this: Is it really that bad for people to bind at pots now? With all the massive amounts of players doing teleports left and right with alts left and right, is this so much of an issue still or just a biased derogatory viewpoint against solo players? | ||
|
|
|